“Greenwashing” is a term that is starting to permeate the
English lexicon. It's a form of marketing spin that is applied to
products to make them more appealing to environmentally conscious consumers. It
takes little to greenwash a product, sometimes changing a label to imply that
it's more environmentally safe is all it takes. Other times, the true
intent for a product may be green, but it still may fall short. There are
plenty of products out there that actually have some eco-friendly qualities,
but on closer look, they're not so environmentally friendly after
all. Here's five that we've found.
 |
| 5 'Green' Products That Aren't As Environmentally Friendly As You Thought 5 'Green' Products That Aren't As Environmentally Friendly As You Thought 5 'Green' Products That Aren't As Environmentally Friendly As You Thought |
1. Rubber mulch. While recycling the rubber from tires is a critical
environmental issue, the solution is not to shred them, dye them and then cover
our flower beds and playgrounds with them. Health concerns have been documented
in factory workers that are attributed to exposure to chemicals and dusts found
in the manufacturing of tires. Use of the recycled tire shreds for home gardens
involves repeated and direct exposure to the same particulates and chemicals.
The dust released can be particularly troublesome for the lungs and it contains
potent carcinogens.
Environment and Human Health, a non-profit health research
group, compiled a summary
of toxic actions brought on by ground up rubber
tires, including neurotoxic responses, thyroid problems, allergic reactions,
and developmental defects. You might be better off sticking to wood mulch,
which will biodegrade more safely into your soil.
2. Biodegradable dog poop
bags. The U.S.'s 78 million dogs produce
more than 10 million tons of waste annually. And while nobody wants this
stuff piling up on our streets and lawns, the way most of us dispose of dog
poop might not be so well thought out.
Many dog waste bags, like BioBags, are made with plant
cellulose and contain no polyethylene. But while it may be fully
biodegradable when composted, the reality is that they'll
probably end up in a landfill. And while the biodegradable bags
will still deteriorate more quickly than plastic bags, that is not
necessarily a good thing. In a landfill, the bag of poop will not compost;
instead it will decompose in a manner that creates copious
amounts of methane, a powerful greenhouse gas that adds to global warming.
Composting dog waste is not such an outlandish idea, some cities have implemented
such programs and the Department of Agriculture has
published guidelines for doing so.
You can buy special
composting systems specifically designed to
handle animal waste.
3. Bamboo fabrics. When you hear that fabrics are made from regenerated,
renewable sources like plant cellulose, you may think you're buying
environmentally friendly duds. But bamboo can be much more of a couture fabric than
a green one.
Bamboo may win you over as it is created from a quickly
renewable plant that requires no fertilizers or pesticides, but the process for
transforming bamboo into textiles can be energy and chemically intensive. The fabric
is rendered by cooking
it in a mixture of lye and carbon disulfide or
other caustic solvents, which is followed by a complex bleaching
process. Moreover, the bamboo clothes you buy are likely processed in
China where there are no laws to protect laborers and the environment from
these harsh chemicals.
4. Ethanol fuel. What could be wrong with a renewable fuel source that helps
us consume less oil? Well, a lot really.
First, there's the food vs. fuel question. Our farmlands are
a fixed resource even as our population and food needs continue to grow. So,
planting fields to produce biofuels, such as ethanol, means we will be
dedicating less land to feeding people and reducing world hunger.
Next, there is the question of whether the ethanol really
lowers carbon emissions. A
recent studyby the journal Nature Climate Change
and the University of Nebraska says no. The study concluded that corn-based
ethanol contributes more to climate change than gasoline in the short term.
When quantified how much carbon is dispersed into the atmosphere when corn
residue is removed to make biofuel (instead of left on farm fields to
replenish them with carbon), the study shows that ethanol didn't come
close to meeting the government standards to qualify as
a renewable fuel source (cellulosic biofuels must release 60%
less carbon pollutants than gasoline to qualify).
5. Green cleaning products. Most conventional cleaning products use alcohol,
chlorine, ammonia or petroleum-based solvents. Each can have negative
effects on health and the environment, but they do clean well. Green cleaning
products (like all-purpose cleaners, floor cleaners and dishwashing liquids)
sound like a good alternative. They're mostly non-toxic, biodegradable and made
from renewable resources... you'd think. One problem: not all of them clean so well, which means you have to use more to get the job done and
buy more plastic packaging. Another problem: Terms like "natural,"
"environmentally friendly," and "non-toxic" found on
packaging and in advertising are meaningless. Some green cleaners may have
mislabeled ingredients and the third-party “eco labels” they tout may be
dubious. They may, in fact, contain some of the toxins you don't want to
use.
http://www.alternet.org/environment/five-green-products-arent-environmentally-friendly-you-thought
